Donald Trump takes on Dick Durbin over 'racial slur'
President Donald Trump has said he was "totally misrepresented" by those saying he used the term "shithole" to describe African nations last week.
Mr Trump also said the allegation was hurting efforts to strike a deal to protect so-called Dreamer immigrants.
The president was responding to a claim by Democratic Senator Dick Durbin that he used "vile and racist" language during a meeting on immigration reform.
The alleged remarks sparked global outrage and demands that he apologise.
"There is no other word one can use but racist," said a UN spokesman.
On Monday, two senators who said he did indeed use the disparaging remark stood by their account of what took place.
What did the president allegedly say?
The row broke out after Republican and Democratic lawmakers visited the president in the Oval Office on Thursday to work on a proposal for an immigration deal.
A key issue they need to agree on is what to do with an Obama-era scheme that protects some 800,000 young people who entered the US illegally as children - known as the Dreamers.
But the alleged slur was uttered during another topic for discussion - the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) given to a number of nationalities currently living in the country.
In recent weeks the Trump administration has made a series of announcements that have brought that status to an end.
Hours after the meeting, reports emerged that Mr Trump had asked: "Why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here?"
The US should be taking in migrants from countries like Norway, he is reported to have said.
Accounts suggest that when Mr Trump was told that the largest groups of immigrants with that status were from El Salvador, Honduras and Haiti, the president responded: "Haitians? Do we need more Haitians?"
What have those in the room said?
On Friday, Mr Durbin said: "I cannot believe that in the history of the White House, in that Oval Office, any president has ever spoken the words that I personally heard our president speak yesterday.
"President Trump said things that were hate-filled, vile, and racist. He used those words repeatedly."
Mr Trump responded by saying his language was "tough" but not the language used in the news reports. He also denied he was a racist.
And on Monday he tweeted that Mr Durbin had "totally misrepresented what was said".
He also blamed the Democratic senator for the apparent impasse over negotiations to reach a solution on the Dreamers.
Have the senators present at the meeting backed him up?
- No - Democratic Dick Durbin said he used the word "shithole" repeatedly
- Yes - Republican David Perdue said the reported racial slur was a "gross misrepresentation"
- No - Republican Lindsey Graham told another senator the reports were "basically accurate"
- Yes - Republican Tom Cotton "didn't hear Trump use derogatory language"
Three other people who were in the room have remained silent.
The two sides in the row became more entrenched on Monday, with Mr Graham appearing to challenge colleagues Perdue and Cotton by saying his memory had not "evolved".
"I know what was said," he said.
And Mr Durbin also said he stood "behind every word", and rejected reports that perhaps Mr Trump said "shithouse" instead.
He added he was focused "full-time" on finding a "future in America" for "those who are being protected by Daca [Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals]".
“Donald Trump Escalates Feud over 'Racial Slur'.” BBC News, BBC, 15 Jan. 2018, www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42696389.
My Write-Up:
My Bias: As I read this, I was aware of my bias against Trump. Although he denies being a racist and making inappropriate comments about Africa, I have no doubt that he actually did. If anything, this article made me respect him even less. Why would he even suggest that the US should take less immigrants from Africa and more from Norway, of all places? On the flip side, I was definitely biased towards Mr Dubin, mostly just because he took a stand against Trump. I think it is brave of him to stand up to the president of the United States.
Publisher's Bias: As usual, the BBC also seems to be biased against Trump, which is hardly surprising since they are a very left-wing organization. They show their bias by focusing on negative things that people said about Trump and by ending with a quote by Mr. Durbin. To be fair though, they also put in Trump's defense and mentioned some people who stood by him which shows that their bias is not getting in the way of their professionalism.
Purpose: I think this article was written to inform people about Trump's latest faux-pas and to keep the public updated with what Trump is up to. People are very interested in what Trump does/says and this article is written for that reason.
Audience: I think the targeted audience are people who are also biased against Trump and therefore are likely to enjoy this article. It is not written for a particularly educated demographic since nothing very complicated is in this article and it is explained quite simply.
Comments
Post a Comment